News:

Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.

Main Menu

68 L-89 with Heavy Duty clutch

Started by sixt9x33rs, September 05, 2014, 06:52:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

sixt9x33rs

If anyone is interested in the above engine, the guy who I bought an 837 alternator from has one freshly built. I have told him to send me pics of the stamp and price. If anyone is interested PM me and I will put you in touch with him.
'69 RS Z/28 65B, 711 Flat hood no spoiler, endura, 4:10 43K miles
69 X77 Z/28 69 69 711 Original Paint Unrestored (Sold)
'69 X66 Convertible 69B 712 auto, (Sold) 44K miles

KurtS

It would be an interesting block, seeing there are no engine codes in 68 for a HD clutch.
And in 69, no cars were built.
Kurt S
CRG

bergy

What are you referring to with the "no cars were built" Kurt?  I know that I have seen "JU" coded blocks.  Maybe you referenced "KE" coded blocks?

KERR


KurtS

From http://www.camaros.org/drivetrain.shtml#PadStamps

Engine Codes Reserved for Use With MA6 Heavy-Duty Clutch
(none known to have been produced):
L48 - HP,  L35 - JU,  L34 - KA,  L78 - KC,  L89 - KE
Kurt S
CRG

bergy

"none known" is different then "none produced"  -  I have seen a factory JU coded block

sixt9x33rs

Once I get the picture I will post it.
'69 RS Z/28 65B, 711 Flat hood no spoiler, endura, 4:10 43K miles
69 X77 Z/28 69 69 711 Original Paint Unrestored (Sold)
'69 X66 Convertible 69B 712 auto, (Sold) 44K miles

KurtS

Production totals for the blocks are zero. Car totals are zero too.
Was the JU block in a car or a service block?

I recall seeing one MA6 block that was apparently built and then reworked by the engine plant and sold as a service block.
Kurt S
CRG

bergy

It was in a car Kurt - I don't believe that I looked for a VIN stamp because it was just a 396/325 motor & dated wrong for the car that it was in.  It didn't have a CE stamp. Original looking stamp though - who re-stamps a 396/325 just for HD clutch?  The owner wasn't even aware of the significance of "JU".  I'm just trying to add to the conversation here guys - I did not take a picture of the block. 

Stingr69

Maybe it was originally from a Chevelle or Vette with the HD clutch?

-Mark.

bergy

HMMMM - It's an odd thing (to me) that 250,000 Camaros were ordered and not one with MA6 in any engine?  Are you sure that the engine production statistics aren't homologated under the most common engine+trans ECL?  Again - not a biggie - I'm certain of what I saw, but can't explain the contradiction???

KurtS

I know of a couple of cars that were attempted to order with the MA6. Orders were held up and finally built without.
Corvettes did get it.
Kurt S
CRG

motorman

Quote from: KurtS on September 10, 2014, 10:25:30 PM
I know of a couple of cars that were attempted to order with the MA6. Orders were held up and finally built without.
Corvettes did get it.
I had to use a L-88 clutch disks in my Z/28 because the stock disk would throw the lining off at high RPMs. also the 10.5 diameter disk with a 11 inch pressure plate would shift better because the edges of the disk would not feather out like using the 11 inch disk
new Camaros owned 68 and 69 Z-28. new Corvettes owned 59,62,63,64,65,66,97,99 02,05 and 08. retired race engine builder, former NASCAR tech inspector