69 Z28 Database

[fiveforty]

I've looked at alot of cars that were suppose to be nice that were junk and cars that were suppose to be matching # and real that were fake. Is there a way to check the database. Also there is one that I think you would like to have entered into your database. Thanks. Leo.

[KurtS]

The database (which includes all 67-9 models, not just Z's) is not public.
Just post the VIN here or send it via email.
Thanks!

[70L34]

Kurt, anything on N531196? Just curious. Thanks, Tony (anausied@hotmail.com)

[KurtS]

No, 70 VIN's away is the closest. 

[KurtS]

To clarify, the db has been laboriously created over the years from various sources. These include observed cars (car shows, ebay, etc), posted or submitted data, and documentation. Most of the data consists of the #'s off of the cars; as you'd expect, most cars don't have documentation.

Even at over 10,000 cars in the db, we still have only 1.5% of the first gen Camaros.

[fiveforty]

I have the info of a POS i was suppose to buy off ebay. Was told it was code 71 Lemans Blue and all matching #s, original panels no rust When I went to pick up the car the tag read code 72 Hugger Orange and the motor was restamped, wrong transmission, carb, pulleys, distributor, intake, angle plug heads and a scattershield. Hacked on quarters and the trunk pan was wrinkled and straightened from being hit in the rear. Let me know. 

[HILROD]

Is there anything on VIN 9n644586 or9n645886? Two numbers double stamped pad is very rough. Thanks

[KurtS]

No, nothing on either of those VINs.

[ckresto]

Her's a number to check.  9N642404

[32fordcpe]

Is there anything on 9N524795

[KurtS]

No, nothing on those VINs.

[ed]

hi i'm Ed from holland and would like to have some info about vin 124379N516157 thanks

[KurtS]

Hi Ed,
Sorry, nothing on that VIN.
As I said above, unless we've run across the car or documentation on the car, it's not likely to be in there. No problem checking.

[blownz]

Kurt, I have owned my 69  Z for 27  yrs, the vin is 124379N613224.  It has a build date of 02D and I had the rear out of it this weekend, it date coded 12/8/68.  It also is cooded BT for 3:55.  It is the same rear that has been in the car since I have owned it.  I also have a late December DZ motor, even though it is not a numbers matching, could it be considered the correct date code? 

Thanks, Wayne

[KurtS]

Wayne,
Not in that timeframe. They were running all out then, parts came in and went right into a car. They didn't sit around.  I had to go back 43,000 cars before yours to see an axle with a date close to that......
Coded correct, but not dated correct, IMO. Not to say that some judging standards wouldn't say it was acceptable.