1969 Z/28 VIN in Registry??

[dannystarr]

Can someone tell me if this VIN is in the system of authenicated VIN's?

19N609027

[bertfam]

Yes, this car is in the database. Please note however, that the CRG DOESN'T "authenticate" cars. That's something you would have to get Jerry to do.

Ed

[dannystarr]

Thanx Ed... Poor choice of words on my part. Just wanted to see if it was in the database.... Thanx...Danny

[BlackoutSteve]

Just wanting to add another 69 Z28 to the registry if one exists please.  
124379N591097 / 124379NOR234055 711, 69-69 02A X77. (Hidden VIN on cowl matches and yellow crayon X7 faintly visable on right rear seat bulkhead, and assuming authentic.)
The car is for sale and new to Australia and has unfortunately been heavily weathered and had race modifications (roll cage and a million drilled holes). It needs a lot of new sheetmetal and complete interior.
Engine and trans are gone.. Axle (BO 3.73 non-posi) does appears to still be in the car. Has the dual exhaust reinforcing plate.
Low optioned. No Tach in dash (no hole for the grommet in firewall either), No console (no rivnuts in tunnel), No D80 (non orig rear is on the car, but two skinny torque rods), Manual steer, Discs but with non OE booster and master.

[KurtS]

Interesting - not common to see a BO axle. Either someone missed the posi recommended note, was being cheap, or the car was ordered from road-racing.
Do you know the date on the axle code?
Thanks!

[BlackoutSteve]

After the disappointing condition of the car, and being satisfied that the car was a Z with the hidden VIN matching and also in line with the Fisher sequencing on the trim tag, we kind of lost interest in the finer details such as the axle's date code. It was hard enough crawling under to see the BO which we assumed was OE..
I didn't know BO was uncommon but in context of the low/no options, it didn't surprise me at all.