Author Topic: Engine photos  (Read 144754 times)

crossboss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
  • ^ New engine project
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #135 on: October 23, 2019, 02:12:47 PM »
Phat-
A true IR Dominator intake while using the larger 1150 cfm carbs can only feed a 350 cid engine @ 8,500 RPMs. The late Bill 'Grumpy' Jenkins was a master at making them work on a 331 cid drag engine. Yes, there were 'some' experimental 4500 series Dominators made, but proved to be unsuccessful. That said, the original sand cast IR Dominators, as you may recall were used on 302 cid engines for Trans-Am competition. Btw, there was never any big-block Dominator IR intakes made (regardless of brand) as I mentioned, not enough carbs to feed it. Fuel injection, and two Autolite 'B' 1425 cfm Inline carbs and the rare Weber 58mm carbs will feed the large big-block Weber IR type intakes….but that is a different topic.
Just another T/A fanatic. Current lifelong projects:
1968 Olds 442 W-30
1969 Mustang Fastback w a Can-Am 494 (Boss 429)

PHAT69AMX

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 90
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #136 on: November 13, 2019, 09:09:27 AM »
Sorry all...  way late responding...  yes...  at 9:41 in the previous video link is the underhood shot that's, yes, basically 'useless' as all that is visible is the air cleaner, not at all visible are the carbs or intake...  apologies

369

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #137 on: February 15, 2020, 10:08:20 PM »
Hi all.....can someone explain the thought process behind using the corvette radiator vs the Camaro stuff. I’m assuming that’s the reason a lot of guys were using the Harrison overflow can?

Jon Mello

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4420
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #138 on: February 16, 2020, 01:15:19 AM »
The Corvette radiators were aluminum vs brass for the Camaro radiators, hence a little weight savings.
Jon Mello
CRG

369

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 46
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #139 on: February 26, 2020, 02:41:37 PM »
10-4....that makes sense

rmbuilder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #140 on: March 17, 2020, 05:11:30 PM »
From last week at Amelia Island.

Bob

Jon Mello

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4420
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #141 on: March 20, 2020, 04:01:20 AM »
Thanks, Bob.  It looked like quite an impressive gathering of Penske race cars at Amelia Island.
Jon Mello
CRG

crossboss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
  • ^ New engine project
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #142 on: March 23, 2020, 11:22:43 PM »
From last week at Amelia Island.

Bob




SWEEEET! Thanks for sharing.
Just another T/A fanatic. Current lifelong projects:
1968 Olds 442 W-30
1969 Mustang Fastback w a Can-Am 494 (Boss 429)

MO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #143 on: March 26, 2020, 03:52:20 AM »
Interesting header bolt configuration.

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #144 on: March 26, 2020, 10:15:38 AM »
Stahl style header style bolt pattern.  For round port heads or spread port heads.

crossboss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
  • ^ New engine project
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #145 on: March 26, 2020, 03:06:23 PM »
Stahl style header style bolt pattern.  For round port heads or spread port heads.




Correct me if I am wrong, it appears there are 'spacers' between the heads and headers? Isn't this for the 'larger' exhausts to mate up...I have seen this before, especially for the mentioned round port/spread port heads, right?
Just another T/A fanatic. Current lifelong projects:
1968 Olds 442 W-30
1969 Mustang Fastback w a Can-Am 494 (Boss 429)

MO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #146 on: March 27, 2020, 06:29:57 PM »
Stahl style header style bolt pattern.  For round port heads or spread port heads.

Thanks for the info. Are the heads already prepped or do you have to drill and tap yourself?

rmbuilder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #147 on: March 30, 2020, 10:31:41 PM »
MO,

The porting of the cylinder heads of that period (Lockerman, Valley Head Service, etc) utilized a large, round, exhaust exit which greatly reduced gasket area. That created a gasket/header flange durability issue particularly in the two adjoining center ports. The solution was adapter plates attached to the head flange. with a revised fastener pattern for the header flange.

rmbuilder

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #148 on: March 30, 2020, 10:32:41 PM »
Flange

firstgenaddict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2882
  • caretaker of 1971 LT1's 11130 & 21783
    • View Profile
    • Groome Family Automobiles
Re: Engine photos
« Reply #149 on: March 31, 2020, 11:50:59 PM »
The Corvette radiators were aluminum vs brass for the Camaro radiators, hence a little weight savings.
I believe JohnZ said that the Aluminum radiator was also a much more efficient design which cooled better.
James
Collectin' Camaro's since "Only Rednecks drove them"
Current caretaker of 1971 LT1's - 11130 and 21783 Check out the Black 69 RS/Z28 45k mile Survivor and the Lemans Blue 69 Z 10D frame off...
https://plus.google.com/photos/112392262205377424364/albums?banner=pwa