Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
CRG Discussion Forum
»
Camaro Research Group Discussion
»
Mild Modifications
»
pollyurathane subframe bushings
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: pollyurathane subframe bushings (Read 7490 times)
clean68rs
Member
Posts: 34
pollyurathane subframe bushings
«
on:
April 28, 2011, 10:22:33 PM »
I have a 68 and was thinking of installing the urathane bushings on the sub frame.Is there someone out there that has done this and how did the handeling change?
Tweet
Logged
flyingskibiker
Member
Posts: 311
Re: pollyurathane subframe bushings
«
Reply #1 on:
April 29, 2011, 03:41:38 AM »
Did you check Team Camaro? Lots of "modifications" there... Pro-touring guys, too.
Logged
Stingr69
Hero Member
Posts: 910
Re: pollyurathane subframe bushings
«
Reply #2 on:
April 29, 2011, 10:17:00 AM »
I have tried poly in the subframe and did not notice anything all that different but I don't push the car that hard.
On the other hand, the poly A-Frame bushings I tried are not an improvement with my near stock suspension setup. The poly bushing material is slick and allows a lot more easy movement in the front suspension on turns. The OEM rubber bushings are "fixed" and have the rubber loaded in shear(resisting rotational movement). That rubber in shear works well with the stock springs and roll bar. It makes sense that the OEM setup was tuned to the hard rubber bushings and stock roll bar. If you take away the rubber in shear's twist resistance from an otherwise stock suspension that it would allow more body roll in turns - and it does.
-Mark.
Logged
77thor
Member
Posts: 329
Re: pollyurathane subframe bushings
«
Reply #3 on:
April 29, 2011, 02:02:38 PM »
Different types(rubber, poly, solids) of Subframe bushings do not have different affects on handling, from my experience.
The car will handle the same with any of them.
Logged
1969 Camaro SS, 350(NOM), M21, 12 Bolt Posi, 01B LOS Build
1977 Camaro, 350(LM1), M20, 10 Bolt Posi, Purchased New, (SOLD)
clean68rs
Member
Posts: 34
Re: pollyurathane subframe bushings
«
Reply #4 on:
May 04, 2011, 11:55:21 AM »
Tanks for the replies.I have replaced the front upper and lower a frame bushings with new oem so I will stay with that.I have been looking at sway bars from diferent companys summit seams to be the most reasonable.I think your paying for the name with some of these other companys I know the old saying you get what you pay for but summit is a reputable company and I have been satisfide with preveous perchacses.Anyones feedback is always appreciated.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
CRG Discussion Forum
»
Camaro Research Group Discussion
»
Mild Modifications
»
pollyurathane subframe bushings