Author Topic: 124379N561026 in database??  (Read 44087 times)

MyRed67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 805
  • SZZLN 67
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2013, 05:13:49 AM »
So he's got both tags?????  Then he has to know that at least one of them can't be correct.
1967 Camaro  LOS  11A
Original Engine   Z - Tribute
Mike C.    NW - Illinois

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2013, 08:07:00 PM »
Here is his response...  The story seems to be changing a little.

   Sorry to hear about the food poisoning! The camaro isn't for sale. I did recently sell it to someone on eBay, but I noticed the cowl tag didn't seam to be fastened correctly like from the factory. So, I told him that I wouldn't feel comfortable selling the 69 as a true x55 car. After that I started to dissect the car and all the other parts I got with it like extra heads and intake. Thats when I recognized the vin matches the trans, engine, and hidden vin spots. The engine has the matching vin, DZ code, Z heads, & z intake. Then when I found the x77 cowl tag and put everything else together I thought that this is a real Z. I'm confused and going back to the person who sold it to me. I'm confused as hell. I wish there were other ways to tell what this camaro is?
Thanks again,

 

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5979
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #17 on: October 28, 2013, 09:34:42 PM »
I want to know what the axle code is.....

Car is not a Z.
Kurt S
CRG

z28z11

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1861
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #18 on: October 28, 2013, 11:06:39 PM »
Tag from the 2008 post and the X77 tag. Subtle differences in font, but the obvious Mongolian is the change from X77 to X55 or vice versa somewhere along the line. What state did it end up in ? The car belongs in a Transformers movie.

Regards,
Steve
1968 Z28 M21/U17 BRG/W 1967 Chevy ll Nova SS 
1969 Z28 X77/M20/VE3 LeMans/W
1969 L78 X66/N66 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48/M35/C60/C06  1949 3100 5wd 235/6

ZLP955

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2186
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2013, 02:16:52 AM »
Are the experts of the opinion that the X55 tag is genuine?
Tim in Australia.
1969 04A Van Nuys Z/28. Cortez Silver, Dark Blue interior, VE3, Z21, Z23, D55/U17, D80, flat hood.
Sold at Clippinger Chevrolet in Covina, CA.
AHRA Formula Stock at Lions Dragstrip, NHRA E/MP at Pomona Raceway

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5781
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2013, 04:52:49 AM »
So the current owner believes he bought a 'fake' SS, that was originally a real Z28 car?   ONE or BOTH of those two tags has to be fake, as they have the same BDY number....
Maybe someone got a deal on two fake tags??  Keeping his options open?  :)
09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette, '60 Corvette, '72 Corvette
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2013, 12:52:16 PM »
Both tags are fake.  Just my $0.02

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2013, 04:31:29 PM »
I told him I didn't think it was a real Z/28, and that I had been in touch with some experts, and they seem to also think the same. Here is his latest reply...     

    Haven't checked behind the heater box. The partial vin on cowl, vin plate, engine, and tranny all match. Can you tell me what is telling you that this is not a real Z/28? What I'm looking at is starting to tell me it could be a z/28 (dz code, matching #'s, z heads, z intake, etc...). I'll look at the rear later this week, and let you know what I find. I also have a meeting to see the person who sold me the Camaro this week too. I appreciate the help and again hope you feel better.
Thanks,
Charlie


 Then my response back to him..

   Email me clear close-up pictures of the front engine pad stamp also. And the trans VIN and build date stamps.
Checking under the heater box is tough. Let’s start with the pictures for now.

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2013, 09:45:15 PM »
Here are some pictures. Kind of a mess with the flashes placed just right, and the SO light depth of the stampings. I don't know about this one. Pretty scary.......Danny

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2013, 09:46:00 PM »
Couple more shots..

z28z11

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1861
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #25 on: October 30, 2013, 02:14:16 AM »
Here are some pictures. Kind of a mess with the flashes placed just right, and the SO light depth of the stampings. I don't know about this one. Pretty scary.......Danny

Sanding scratches to cover feed lines from surfacing ? Too little of the deck surface in the shot to tell. Bulkhead reads "X5" or "X7" - can't tell. Deck stamp looks decent, but the whole thing gets worse all the time. Trans stamp looks decent. I'd bet the X55 stamp was original, then changed to an X77 at some point - you think ?

Like any other car - if all the documentation you have is a cowl tag, you'd best look real close - at everything.

Regards,
Steve
1968 Z28 M21/U17 BRG/W 1967 Chevy ll Nova SS 
1969 Z28 X77/M20/VE3 LeMans/W
1969 L78 X66/N66 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48/M35/C60/C06  1949 3100 5wd 235/6

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5979
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #26 on: October 30, 2013, 03:25:06 AM »
Interesting. The original pad was better. The DZ was in-line. You can see the top of the D still there. And the partial Z of the right wasn't there.
Still a restamp.
I suspect the trans, but can't tell from that pic.
I suspect the X55 tag could be real. X77 isn't.
Kurt S
CRG

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2013, 01:32:22 PM »
I suspect the X55 tag could be real. X77 isn't.

You are probably right but for some reason it doesnt look right to me... ???  I guess that is why I will never consider myself an expert..   ;D

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2013, 01:36:17 PM »
Quote from: z28z11[/quote
Bulkhead reads "X5" or "X7" - can't tell. Deck stamp looks decent, but the whole thing gets worse all the time. Trans stamp looks decent. I'd bet the X55 stamp was original, then changed to an X77 at some point - you think ?

Like any other car - if all the documentation you have is a cowl tag, you'd best look real close - at everything.

Regards,
Steve

It almost looks as if it was X5 and someone changed the 5 to a 7..  Would need a much better pic to be able to tell.

ko-lek-tor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1858
  • someday I'll get one finished
    • View Profile
Re: 124379N561026 in database??
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2013, 02:15:37 PM »

I suspect the X55 tag could be real. X77 isn't.

Could an X55 have had that M21 trans? Thought that was a solid lifter and 396/350hp only?
Bentley to friends :1969 SS/RS 396 owned 79
1969 SS 350 (sold)
1969 D.H.COPO replica 4spd. owned since 85
1967 302 4 spd 5.13

 

anything