124379N561026 in database??

[Iluv69s]

just looked at 69 Z for sale...any info on car?? Im suspicious...Thanks

[KurtS]

No, nothing on that car.

[Iluv69s]

Thanks Kurt,

   well..this will tell me alot... I got a pic!!  I'm curious what you think about the tag....  does it line up with the vin???

 I'm no expert on these thats for sure...  Thanks again

[RamAirDave]

I'd say the VIN is okay for that tag date.

...But the tag is fake.

[Jerry@CHP]

Yes, this is a fake tag for sure,

Jerry

[Iluv69s]

I must be getting better at this...I thought it looked bogus...and the rivets were the first giveaway...ita amazing because the owner is supposed to show me the original vin stamped DZ block and trans this week...I guess maybe its a real car that somone changed the tag back in the day?? I really dont believe the current owner of the car has a a clue about fake trim tags...

well, if nothing else. heres one for the database of 'bogus' cars.... Did they even have x-codes at this period of time?   Thanks again CRG!!

[tom]

When you go to see the block and trans try to get pictures.

Tom

[Iluv69s]

sure will try to take some pics...the owner wasnt so keen on takin pics, but he did not protest when i insisted...I think he is more paranoid about getting ripped off tahn anything...apparently he has a rather large collection of parts too, so I really dont blame him......but Ill see what i can do...

  Thanks again guys...

[ko-lek-tor]

Thought someone may want to know the latest morph on this:   http://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-Chevrolet-Camaro-SS-350-4-Spd-Hugger-Orange-Project-Real-SS-80-Photos-/251358325302?forcerrptr=true&item=251358325302&pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item3a861faa36&nma=true&si=mL3Be0Bc6FtgpH9K6tPO%252FAAtGqk%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

[z28z11]

Biggest brass cujones I have read about lately - man oh man, that's brazen. People apparently don't think about e-files and memories.
Same guy, or different owner ?

Regards,
Steve

[cook_dw]

Yeah that is pretty bad...  What is this world coming to...  Sad..

[Mike S]

 That is not the same tag from the old thread to the new one. The numbers stamped are but the tag isn't.

Mike

[MyRed67]

That is not the same tag from the old thread to the new one. The numbers stamped are but the tag isn't.

Mike

Agreed, doesn't look to be the same tag.  Am I correct, the car should have a Black Vinyl top?  Sure doesn't show any signs.  And I didn't see any of the trim in the spare parts.

[z28z11]

That is not the same tag from the old thread to the new one. The numbers stamped are but the tag isn't.

Mike

I agree it's not the same tag - that's the point. If this is the same owner as the car in the 2008 thread (that's why I asked if it was), it's obvious he had a new X77 tag made using the X55 tag info - maybe because he had a 386 block to go with the car originally, which would work with a 12B X77. Shame on him for a flagrant foul here - 

[dannystarr]

In contact with the NEW owner. He just bought it 2 months ago. So no, it's not the same guy. Get this, in the bin of parts he got the X77 tag. More to come.. Danny