Author Topic: Caveat Emptor...new tag?  (Read 10616 times)

william

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
    • View Profile
Learning more and more about less and less...

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
    • View Profile

Steve Shauger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
    • View Profile
    • Vintage Certification
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2017, 04:30:17 PM »
The owner of the car reached out to me the last time it was for sale. I offered my opinion at his request and informed him of all the issues I found with the car. He stated he had gotten a differing opinion from a known Camaro expert/ business in MI. It was not HBC just for clarification.
Steve Shauger
Vintage Certification™ Program, Providing Recognition And Status To Unrestored Vehicles.  The Supercar Registry-www.yenko.net-

KurtS

  • CRG Coordinator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5979
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2017, 05:29:00 PM »
I live in MI and that's a fake tag. :)

Engine Block            3970010      B029  V0725DZ
Radiator (Harrison)      CB           E
Rear Axle                3969341NF  Hl89   BU0829G2
Transmission           3925660                P9T04B

An 010 block cast in early Feb 69?  A 341 axle without a C prefix? Early Dec trans in a Sept car?
Yikes!
Kurt S
CRG

bertfam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4492
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2017, 05:41:20 PM »
Quote
I offered my opinion at his request and informed him of all the issues I found with the car. He stated he had gotten a differing opinion from a known Camaro expert/ business in MI.

Typical. Ignore the answers you don't like and find someone that will give you the answers you DO like. There are so many Camaro "experts" out there that you can usually find one that will agree with you! They're experts by no means whatsoever, but that's what they call themselves.

Ed

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5781
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2017, 11:37:32 PM »
An 'expert' is anyone from 'out of town'...  :)    Or we could define  'EX - SPURT'..  :)
09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette, '60 Corvette, '72 Corvette
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan

z28z11

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1861
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2017, 12:34:05 AM »
Man, that tag is crisp and tall. Wish the Addressographs in the day were that precise, but then what would distinguish them nowadays ?

Nonetheless, still pretty -

Regards,
Steve
1968 Z28 M21/U17 BRG/W 1967 Chevy ll Nova SS 
1969 Z28 X77/M20/VE3 LeMans/W
1969 L78 X66/N66 Cortez/BVT
1969 Z11 L48/M35/C60/C06  1949 3100 5wd 235/6

BillOhio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
    • photobucket
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2017, 12:53:31 AM »
What got me is the date on the pop of the transmission does match the transmission. How could the pop and the car be made months before the transmission. Amazing!!
1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1968 RS 327 4 speed
1970 Z28 M22 4:10 bought from original owner
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4480
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2017, 02:15:08 AM »
The owner of the car reached out to me the last time it was for sale. I offered my opinion at his request and informed him of all the issues I found with the car. He stated he had gotten a differing opinion from a known Camaro expert/ business in MI. It was not HBC just for clarification.
I actually contacted the ebay seller (who says he is helping a friend), and let him know that there were some discrepancies.  I told him I was not an expert, but I suggested he contact Jerry or Steve, and that I thought they were both reputable experts. (Thanks Steve)
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
-Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear)
-Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
-Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

BillOhio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
    • photobucket
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2017, 12:17:24 PM »
I assume this guy thinks his transmission is Dec of 68.  Let's say it was October and this car is October of 69. Is the transmission date the same for one built in October of 68 compared to October of 69 or did it get a c or something  like axles?
1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1968 RS 327 4 speed
1970 Z28 M22 4:10 bought from original owner
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4480
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2017, 10:09:39 PM »
I believe the trans would have a P8 if it was October of 68. Yes he does think it was a late 68. I tried to describe that even that would be a huge time frame for it to sit around, and he said his "expert" said it fits fine. I thought instead of getting into the minutia of trans date sit would be better for him to talk to an expert. So I passed along Steves info (thanks Steve)
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
-Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear)
-Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
-Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

BillOhio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
    • photobucket
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2017, 10:29:23 PM »
I was understanding the year as model year and all 69s should have a 9? I would guess normally there wouldn't be much to any overlap of reusing a month. But in 69 with the late production they could overlap the same month used in late 68
1969 Z28, Burgandy, numbers matching, 12,900 miles
1968 RS 327 4 speed
1970 Z28 M22 4:10 bought from original owner
1961 Chrysler 300G convertible

BULLITT65

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4480
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2017, 10:38:19 PM »
Sorry you are correct:
http://www.camaros.org/drivetrain.shtml#trans

Still a long time for it to sit around. IMO trans was put together after the car
1969 garnet red Z/28 46k mile unrestored X77
-Looking for 3192477 (front) spiral shocks 3192851 (rear)
-Looking for an original LOF soft ray windshield
-Looking for original Delco side post negative battery cable part # 6297651AV

cook_dw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2017, 01:17:56 AM »
The owner of the car reached out to me the last time it was for sale. I offered my opinion at his request and informed him of all the issues I found with the car. He stated he had gotten a differing opinion from a known Camaro expert/ business in MI. It was not HBC just for clarification.


Quote from sYc thread about the car.

http://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=142024

Quote
Quote from: juliosz;1346735
I looked at the car a couple of weeks ago.  Owner is a nice guy and very accommodating.  I too had concerns with the tag as well as I could not find a VIN anywhere on the block.  Several small items missing that would add up.  Console and gauges added according to owner.  Camaro expert referenced in his description is Richard Maksym (Coast 2 Coast Camaro) who also did much of the work. Paint is really nice overall and interior needs minor sorting out. I am not 100% sure the tag is a problem and I was less concerned with the POP.  The car however presented me with more questions than answers so the search goes on for me.

william

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
    • View Profile
Re: Caveat Emptor...new tag?
« Reply #14 on: June 01, 2018, 11:42:49 PM »
Re-listed. Apparently ignored all the advice he didn't want to hear.
Learning more and more about less and less...

 

anything