STOP!! Do NOT drill any holes just yet!!
The 1968 U15 AIM drawing is INCORRECT. It was taken from the 1967 AIM and simply modified to add the extra hole.
HOWEVER, even though the 1968 U15 drawing indicates a 13/32" diameter hole was "supposed" to be drilled at that location, I don't believe ALL cars actually got that hole. And the reason I say that is because I have pictures of 6 cars in the database with U15 and only 1 of them has that hole (A 03C Norwood car shown below, and to be honest, it appears to be even farther than the .69" indicated in the AIM. Probably located in the existing square hole used for the power top switch on convertibles). The other 5 have the cable assembly installed in the "existing hole" (see below of a good example from a 1968 07C LA car using the "existing" hole and the 03C Norwood car using the "drilled" hole - which probably isn't really "drilled" and is in reality the square hole for the power top switch on convertibles. By the way, the 03C Norwood car is missing the rubber knob, but you CAN see the silver metal knurled cable the rubber knob attaches to sticking out of the dash).
In 1967, only cars with C60 received the outlet ducts, but nowhere in the AIM does it indicate that the U15 cable needs to be relocated because of the interference with the hose. But going by pictures of original cars with C60 and U15 (good example in the link above and the picture shown below), the factory DID drill a new hole to keep the cable from hitting the ducting.
Since all cars in 1968 came with the ducting, they made a note in the AIM dated 9-19-67 to relocate the cable to .69" to the right to alleviate this interference. However, as I stated before, I don't believe all 68's with U15 received this extra hole. I believe, going by the available data (and granted, there's not a lot since this is such a rare option), the cable was simply installed in the existing hole for most installations. Difficult to do because of the hose, but possible.
NOTE: In reality, a hole drilled .69" to the right of the existing hole (just a bit less than 3/4 of an inch) wouldn't interfere with the plastic speedometer housing. The cable would be just to the left of it, so again, the AIM drawing is incorrect.
First picture - 1967 with C60 and U15 (cable installed in a hole NOT indicated in the 67 AIM. Also note the extra washer not called out in the 67 or 68 AIM.)
Second picture - 1968 LA 07C showing the cable installed in the "existing" hole
Third picture - 1968 NOR 03C showing the cable installed in a location that appears to me to be even farther to the right than what the AIM indicates it should be! Probably in the square hole used for the power top switch on convertibles.)
Ed