Z28 VIN tag for sale

[m22mike]

 
For re;
124379L505413
BDY#
125673LOS

For sale on ebay. item# 272104245633
 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-Chevy-Camaro-Z-28-Vin-Tags-/272104245633?hash=item3f5aad4981:g:be4AAOSwHaBWkuLT&vxp=mtr


This is a set of vin tags with title and partial build sheet from a 1969 RS Z28 camero vin code shows this to be
 
Hugger orange with white stripes .
 
Rear spoiler.
 
Cowl hood with flipper.
 
White standard interior.
 
 This is a true Camero enthusiasts collectors item !! Good luck bidding !!
 

[BULLITT65]

So you would really have to know your codes on that build sheet to make the connection that this was a Z/28 right? I don't know the codes all that well, but i do see the PS under the front shock code which would be correct, and the paint code matches, so it is probably the same car. I don't see the VIN on that partial build sheet.

I guess the best thing to do is note down the Vin, because this car will be re-created at some point

[cook_dw]

That is one super rare Camero..

This is a set of vin tags with title and partial build sheet from a 1969 RS Z28 camero vin code shows this to be
Hugger orange with white stripes .
Rear spoiler.
Cowl hood with flipper.
White standard interior.
 This is a true Camero enthusiasts collectors item !! Good luck bidding !!

[69Z28-RS]

I don't think I have appropriate words to describe such a ...  seller... 

[X33RS]

Clue me in,   Tag says 10D and he claims it came factory with cowl hood.   Now is this a 10D 68 car?  Were they putting the hoods on that early at the LOS plant?  That's hard to believe considering that would be 2 months before Norwood even started doing it. 

Or....is he getting that hood information from that partial build sheet?

[hubleyman]

I compared the posted Broadcast Copy to remnants from my old LA built RS Z (built a couple months later than this one) and the data seems to line up consistently.

I'm guessing the sheet and the tags all came from the same car. 

Not sure where the Cowl hood info comes from, since it is an early '68 built car, but I don't know all the BC codes?  Maybe he parted the car out and it had a cowl hood on it?

Charlie

[BULLITT65]

He is probably remembering what the car had on it, or embellishing what the car could be, (selling a dream to somebody).

Way to early for the ZL-2 hood, and they didn't make any late 69 LA cars....so there you go.

[bcmiller]

Tag is early style and VIN is early, so it is definitely 10D of 1968.

I will check the codes.  They seem OK from what I could see with a quick glance.

9L505413
LOS 125673

[X33RS]

Aha, okay then I'm not loosing my mind yet    Thanks for clarifying that for me.

[bcmiller]

Too early for cowl hood, if that's what you are talking about.

[X33RS]

Yup, that's what I was thinking.
Thanks

[z28z11]

Shame the rest of the broadcast copy didn't make it. Bet it was on top of the tank, being an VN build ?

Regards,
Steve

[1968RSZ28]

It is illegal to sell VIN tags; so report the listing!

Here's how...

In the listing click on "Report item",
Under "Report Category" choose "Prohibited and restricted items",
Under "Reason for Report" choose "Vehicle and vehicle parts and accessories",
Under "Detailed Reason" choose "VIN plates and VIN rivets"
Click on "Continue" and then "Send Report"

Thanks! 

Paul

[click]

For discussion, my 10D Los car is 505849 partial VIN  and my trim tag is 132383  so while the VIN's are only 436 apart, the trim tags are 6,710 apart . It just seems odd to me that there is that wide a difference in VIN and trim tag numbers for the same week of 10D.  Just something to think about... maybe Mark or Kurt can help explain those spreads? 

[69Z28-RS]

For discussion, my 10D Los car is 505849 partial VIN  and my trim tag is 132383  so while the VIN's are only 436 apart, the trim tags are 6,710 apart . It just seems odd to me that there is that wide a difference in VIN and trim tag numbers for the same week of 10D.  Just something to think about... maybe Mark or Kurt can help explain those spreads? 

The VIN difference is about 1/2 day of production, whereas the BDY NO difference is 7-8 days (week and a half) apart.   That is not difficult for me to believe at all given that BDY NO is assigned on order (whether it be an internal GM order, dealer order, or customer SOLD order).  Customer Sold Orders got assigned for production ASAP, ahead of internal or dealer stock orders.   Other reasons for a slippage of one order over another are parts availability to satisfy an option specified in the order (which might not be immediately available).   I've special ordered several cars in my life, and some were assigned into production within a week or so, whereas others had to wait 3-4 weeks to begin production.   Mark, William, or Kurt may have other reasons for such a difference.