Author Topic: 1969 shocks  (Read 4277 times)

69z28fan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
1969 shocks
« on: September 02, 2020, 04:34:29 PM »
Once again I’m turning to the experts. I have a 69 ss396, multi leaf rear with stock GM shocks. I’m trying to get a better ride without changing the entire suspension. Never raced just a cruiser. Ideas on front and rear shocks. 

crossboss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
  • ^ New engine project
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2020, 05:52:57 PM »
Once again I’m turning to the experts. I have a 69 ss396, multi leaf rear with stock GM shocks. I’m trying to get a better ride without changing the entire suspension. Never raced just a cruiser. Ideas on front and rear shocks.



FWIW,
Some guys on the other car sites I visit asked the same questions. I will give you my same answer: Go with KYBs. They ride/handle nice, and are quite reasonable in price. You can paint them the 'correct' color, and no one will be the wiser.
Just another T/A fanatic. Current lifelong projects:
1968 Olds 442 W-30
1969 Mustang Fastback w a Can-Am 494 (Boss 429)

camaronut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 719
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2020, 07:43:35 PM »
If you still want originality, repro spiral shocks are an option, however - the ride is not that good.
I use to have Monroe shocks, but KYB’s are an excellent choice.
That’s my two cents.

69Z28-RS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5781
  • owner since 4-Apr-1976
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2020, 11:39:35 PM »
OR...   if you have the factory original shocks, you can probably sell them to someone desiring a 'points' car, and make enough to buy yourself a set of Konis...  :)

09C 69Z28-RS, 72 B 720 cowl console rosewood tint
69 Corvette, '60 Corvette, '72 Corvette
90 ZR1 red/red #246, 90 ZR1 white/gray #2466
72 El Camino, '55-'56-'57 Nomads, '55-'57 B/A Sedan

Gars68Tux

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 259
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2020, 11:53:12 PM »
 Which KYB's are you guys referring to ?  The "gas-a-just" are extremely firm, imo...especially in the rear. "Excel-G" is much more pleasant for a cruiser.  ;)
Garth

68 RS L30 AA 749 Fred Gibb Chevrolet

crossboss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
  • ^ New engine project
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2020, 01:14:48 AM »
OR...   if you have the factory original shocks, you can probably sell them to someone desiring a 'points' car, and make enough to buy yourself a set of Konis...  :)



Koni's are not cheap AND the ride quality is more for a road racer type set up. KYB's do have different types as well.
Just another T/A fanatic. Current lifelong projects:
1968 Olds 442 W-30
1969 Mustang Fastback w a Can-Am 494 (Boss 429)

crossboss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
  • ^ New engine project
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2020, 01:21:56 AM »
Which KYB's are you guys referring to ?  The "gas-a-just" are extremely firm, imo...especially in the rear. "Excel-G" is much more pleasant for a cruiser.  ;)



Like my previous post, it will determine what you are after. Koni's will ride harsh. The KYB 'Gas a just'' shock will ride smoother than an equivalent Koni. Boys, remember we are talking about a 'performance' car here (a Big Block), not a Cadillac. So, you still want it to ride nice and firm like a performance car should, not squishy like moms old station wagon. This is why I prefer and recommend the KYB's on my street cars.
Just another T/A fanatic. Current lifelong projects:
1968 Olds 442 W-30
1969 Mustang Fastback w a Can-Am 494 (Boss 429)

Gars68Tux

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 259
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2020, 07:56:37 AM »
Gas-a-just would probably be fine in the front, since it's a BB, but still think they're way too stiff in the rear with multi-leaf springs. About like riding in a truck if the roads aren't perfect.  Excel G's are gas charged as well so probably a step up from stock, but not nearly as harsh as G-a-J...

 
Garth

68 RS L30 AA 749 Fred Gibb Chevrolet

crossboss

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 780
  • ^ New engine project
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2020, 02:33:42 PM »
Gas-a-just would probably be fine in the front, since it's a BB, but still think they're way too stiff in the rear with multi-leaf springs. About like riding in a truck if the roads aren't perfect.  Excel G's are gas charged as well so probably a step up from stock, but not nearly as harsh as G-a-J...

 




All I can say, when I used KYB shocks on my Big Block Mustangs with the Competition Suspension and regular versions (all cars had multi leaf rears) using the Gas-A-Just shocks, they all rode nice. Never too stiff. Boys, also take into consideration either a Camaro or Mustang's rear leaf springs are very similar in design, and function. Just my worthless two cents...
Just another T/A fanatic. Current lifelong projects:
1968 Olds 442 W-30
1969 Mustang Fastback w a Can-Am 494 (Boss 429)

GMAD_Van Nuys

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 355
    • View Profile
Re: 1969 shocks
« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2020, 04:04:14 PM »
The brand and age of the tires on your car can make a big difference in the ride of your vehicle.