Author Topic: '67 Camaro leaf springs  (Read 5213 times)

Vetteman61

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
'67 Camaro leaf springs
« on: January 23, 2013, 05:26:34 AM »
Will '67 and '68 Camaro leaf springs interchange as long as they match in relation to mono or multi leaf.  I have searched and found conversion info, but I'm unsure if I found a monoleaf '68 leaf spring if it would bolt right up to my '67 Camaro.

Thanks,
Brandon

x77-69z28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
    • View Profile
Re: '67 Camaro leaf springs
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2013, 07:41:29 AM »
Yes, they are the same
69 Z/28 X77 burnished brown, 711 int 05A bought in 78
70 Z28 forrest green, green int, M40, bk vinyl roof PROJECT
99 SS hugger orange 6spd NO TTOPS bought new 1 of 54
15 z/28 Arctic white, A/C 505 HP #251

bertfam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4492
    • View Profile
Re: '67 Camaro leaf springs
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2013, 02:57:23 PM »
Yes they will, but spring rates are dependant on a multitude of factors, so a spring from a 68 will fit, but the ride height may be different.

Ed

Vetteman61

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Re: '67 Camaro leaf springs
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2013, 04:37:26 PM »
OK, thank you for the responses.




Brandon

vtfb68

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
    • View Profile
Re: '67 Camaro leaf springs
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2013, 08:27:43 PM »
Ed,
 At what gas tank level, human weight,  did the factory calculate the spring capacities ? was there a formula?
  Victor
68 05C LA RS/SS U2 712 L34 M21 BR
68 08E LA RS Y2 749 L30 M35
67 11B LA  RS/SS M-1 797-Z L48 M21  Convertible

bertfam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4492
    • View Profile
Re: '67 Camaro leaf springs
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2013, 08:42:31 PM »
John can answer this better than I can, but the spring rates themselves were based on what options were added (or subtracted) to/from the car. In general, different springs rates were used to keep the "ride height" at a constant, compared with other Camaros.

With a few variances between years, this height was based on two basic conditions:

1. "As Shipped", which was the car, oil, water, 2 gallons of fuel and the recommended tire pressure (24lbs front and rear)
2. "Curb Weight", which was the car, oil, water, a full tank of fuel and the recommended tire pressure (24lbs front and rear)

For 1967, the measurements are on UPC 3, sheet A8. For 1968 you can see the measurements on UPC 0, sheet A11, and for 1969 it's on UPC 0, sheet A10.

There were a lot of other factors involved, but the above is the jist of what they were trying to accomplish.

Ed