« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: Stamping Opinion  (Read 7922 times)

Mike S

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2676
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2023, 02:38:54 AM »
 The smooth area looks like peeling paint over a previously painted surface.

Mike
Logged
67 04B LOS SS/RS L35 Hardtop - Original w/UOIT
67 05B NOR SS/RS L35 Convertible - Restored

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #16 on: September 06, 2023, 06:58:56 PM »
There is NO reason not to have good clear close-up high-resolution pictures. It's just not that tough to accomplish. SO MANY cars for sale with PERFECT pictures... THEN come the blurry Block/Trans/Rear pictures. ... Danny
Logged

dannystarr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1745
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #17 on: September 06, 2023, 07:01:25 PM »
Pics.. It is endless... D
Logged

rocco376

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #18 on: September 06, 2023, 07:45:32 PM »
The original pic they sent me is horrendous.  They are supposed to be sending the rest today.  Nothing yet.
Logged

Jonesy

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 478
  • 1969 Camaro z28
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2023, 03:15:59 AM »
For $101,000 I would want alot of things corrected on that car. Master cyl and booster are after market pieces. Rear springs. If those are wrong what about the rest of the small components that add up like distributor, carb, radiator, generator, starter, water pump, fan, cowl seal is upside down, radiator cap, goofy radio knobs, drilled holes in the dash to permanently mount gauges, etc etc
Logged
1967 RS-Z/28 Nantucket Blue the D-2 car
1969 RS/SS 350 4 speed Azure Turquoise
1969 Z28 Azure Turquoise

rocco376

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2023, 12:06:00 PM »
All good points.  If it truly is an original drivetrain car, obviously at the right price, it may be worth it.  However, the photos never arrived yesterday.
Logged

68 Ragtop

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2023, 01:11:23 PM »
Shouldn't a January 1969 car have a tachometer as required equipment with Z28 RPO?
Logged

x66 714

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1820
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #22 on: September 07, 2023, 01:47:09 PM »
Quote from: 68 Ragtop on September 07, 2023, 01:11:23 PM
Shouldn't a January 1969 car have a tachometer as required equipment with Z28 RPO?

No. Not till April 1969 if I remember correctly.....Joe
Logged
See America's First, Chevrolet

1968 Z/28 Corvette Bronze. Black Hounds Tooth. 02E Los Angeles born 3/13/1968 pnt OO. Purchased March 1976
1969 SS396 Yellow/Yellow 08E Norwood born 8/28/1969 pnt 76E. Purchased April 1981

bcmiller

  • CRG Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4101
    • View Profile
Re: Stamping Opinion
« Reply #23 on: September 07, 2023, 05:47:45 PM »
Quote from: 68 Ragtop on September 07, 2023, 01:11:23 PM
Shouldn't a January 1969 car have a tachometer as required equipment with Z28 RPO?

From the 1969 ID HyperTable.
http://www.camaros.org/diffs69.shtml

Tachometer was optional except for post-May Z28's.
Logged
Bryon / 1968 Camaro SS 396 coupe - now old school 468 big block
1967 Camaro RS/SS 396 coupe L35/M40 - 4 generation family project
Looking for 68 Camaro with body # NOR 181016
Pages: 1 [2]  All
« previous next »