1
Originality / Re: '67-'69 Decklid Bumpers
« on: February 05, 2025, 08:03:50 PM »
KF are what are on my 02A Van Nuys built Z28
News:
Welcome to the CRG Discussion Forum!
Classified ads are not allowed on the forum.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
General Discussion / Re: LA built Camaros rear leaf spring black paint
« on: January 22, 2025, 09:51:57 PM »
Neither of my 2 Van Nuys 69's had undercoating on the floor pans/tunnel area. Only in the rear wheel wells.
3
General Discussion / Re: LA built Camaros rear leaf spring black paint
« on: January 22, 2025, 09:42:20 PM »
I have an 02A built VanNuys Z28 with 77,000 miles that is very original, was sold new at Washburn Chev in Santa Barbara and lived pretty much all its life in California or Colorado not exposed to harsh elements.. The original rear leaf springs appear to be natural steel. I dont see any gas tank blackout unless that was a 67-68 thing.
My gas tank is the original and had the build sheet on top of it. It also looks like a brand new tank but its definately the original and is stamped 25 69 with the backwards 5. Car still retains its original factory paint hood and deck striping.
Previous owner changed out the original hood for a cowl induction hood but the stripes on the cowl panel and front upper valance are original.
My gas tank is the original and had the build sheet on top of it. It also looks like a brand new tank but its definately the original and is stamped 25 69 with the backwards 5. Car still retains its original factory paint hood and deck striping.
Previous owner changed out the original hood for a cowl induction hood but the stripes on the cowl panel and front upper valance are original.
4
General Discussion / Re: 124379N576051 1969 L78 on BAT
« on: January 02, 2025, 12:01:51 AM »
Stampings all look legit. WS was a fake. Cowl tag is hard to tell with pics provided.
5
General Discussion / Re: Looking for my original 302 DZ
« on: January 01, 2025, 11:57:55 PM »
He replied in another post in 2009 about 1969 decklid holes. Heres what he posted
I have an 03E car that has both sets of holes in the deck lid.
I spoke with the original owner who purchased the car from dealer and the spoiler package (D80) was installed at the factory, not the dealership.
-Dave B.
I have an 03E car that has both sets of holes in the deck lid.
I spoke with the original owner who purchased the car from dealer and the spoiler package (D80) was installed at the factory, not the dealership.
-Dave B.
6
Decoding/Numbers / Re: '69 Trim Tag
« on: November 24, 2024, 04:38:40 PM »
That car was once in Arizona. Its an 09B tag so was built at Van Nuys Sept 1968. Looks fine. Its been through a couple of Mecum auctions over the years. Looks like it has POP. Not sure what happened, in the pics at Mecum 2013 it had the priginal master and brake booster. At Alexander in 2024 is has some chinese repo master and booster.
124379L501887
https://www.alexanderautomotive.net/inventory/chevrolet/camaro-ss/9l501887/
124379L501887
https://www.alexanderautomotive.net/inventory/chevrolet/camaro-ss/9l501887/
7
General Discussion / Re: Buyer Beware
« on: November 24, 2024, 04:21:52 PM »
RS was added. No vacuum tank, hoses, headlight squirters. Sticker says 72-72 but tag says 72-B.
8
General Discussion / Re: 1969 Z28 124379N625723 on BAT
« on: November 24, 2024, 04:06:44 PM »
If you read McNeishs report alot of things needed to be corrected. The grill is a repop out of the box and put on the car.
Then the seller lists all the things he bought and most all are repop parts and he thinks that satisfies the corrections that Jerry mentioned. One in particular is the NAPA replacement water pump. It could be a nice car with some money spent on actually correcting the items.
I guess some people just like the look and dont care about the details. The engine block pad was decked so no numbers remain except for the partial VIN down by the filter. The buyer will have a hard time getting his money out of it when the time comes. You could have bought 2 really nice documented by MacNeish 69 Z28's for the price this went for. Seller did a great job with pictures and hyping up the car.
Then the seller lists all the things he bought and most all are repop parts and he thinks that satisfies the corrections that Jerry mentioned. One in particular is the NAPA replacement water pump. It could be a nice car with some money spent on actually correcting the items.
I guess some people just like the look and dont care about the details. The engine block pad was decked so no numbers remain except for the partial VIN down by the filter. The buyer will have a hard time getting his money out of it when the time comes. You could have bought 2 really nice documented by MacNeish 69 Z28's for the price this went for. Seller did a great job with pictures and hyping up the car.
9
General Discussion / Re: Haven’t we seen this trim tag before?
« on: November 24, 2024, 03:56:44 PM »
That tag is legit. Car was originally an X11 small block Azure Turquoise car that someone painted orange and add the 427 engine.
I dont think hes trying to advertise it as something it isnt.
124379N690223
I dont think hes trying to advertise it as something it isnt.
124379N690223
10
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Original 467 distributor
« on: November 04, 2024, 08:41:15 PM »
Agreed, restamped for sure. The 4-6-7 are not factory along with the date stamping 8-G
11
General Discussion / Re: 69 SS 396 sold on ebay. trim tag legit?
« on: October 08, 2024, 10:53:16 AM »
That’s a reproduction tag for sure.
124379N556276
124379N556276
12
General Discussion / Re: 3938615 fan shroud
« on: September 26, 2024, 09:19:45 PM »
We are talking about 1969 Camaro small block fan shrouds (3938615)
3893812 is 67-68, so I cant comment on those.
3893812 is 67-68, so I cant comment on those.
13
General Discussion / Re: 3938615 fan shroud
« on: September 25, 2024, 08:58:09 PM »
There are numbers after the part numbers on the small block shrouds. Ihave seen 1 and 2 used. I was always under the impression that was a mold number sequence.
1 was the first mold so early cars would have that followed by 2 and so on. I dont know if this is true as I can only speak on my own experience with what I have seen.
1 was the first mold so early cars would have that followed by 2 and so on. I dont know if this is true as I can only speak on my own experience with what I have seen.
14
Restoration / Re: 1969 Z28 heater core-best quality replacement?
« on: September 10, 2024, 09:32:02 PM »
Even if you found a used original (that was good or you could have repaired), that would be better than any chinese aftermarket one.
15
Decoding/Numbers / Re: Water pump
« on: August 28, 2024, 07:44:28 PM »
Your 69 L48 would have come with a 3927170 pump or 3953692 pump.