Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hugger69z28rs

Pages: [1] 2
1
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: July 22, 2024, 02:58:55 AM »
Odd to see stainless trim on the turn signal lens on a 5A build as they were discontinued during early production and not seen after January/early February 69 builds. The seat belts (5th week of 69) are also early dates for a May build. 


If I'm correct based off this link http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=8327.0 my car was involved in the VN strike that started in April and ended mid June of 1969. If that link is correct and the plant was only reopened to clear the last 1200 Camaros, then my car would of have in that list. My guess is they used what they had to clear the line at that time which might be why my belts differ.

2
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: May 21, 2024, 10:57:53 PM »
Thank you but this is not from Fletcher's Chevrolet in Encino.

Here is mine.


3
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: February 09, 2024, 05:59:13 PM »
I just checked the driver seat belt and it is 13 F 69. The back seat is 12E 69. This car came with deluxe seat belt and front shoulder belts as an option. The shoulder belts are marked 43 C 68 both sides. 

4
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 30, 2024, 11:40:24 AM »
Would that be the same person who stamped the engine?

5
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 27, 2024, 03:30:59 AM »
Transmission stamp. If this picture post upside down I'm sorry.

6
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 26, 2024, 12:19:51 PM »
My engine stamp and this is where it got interesting for me, but I found this thread on this site. The car in the link was built same week(05A) as mine in the LOS plant. The car in the link is stamped the same way but his engine stamp is off one number to his serial number. Mine is the correct number but stamped across the DZ stamp using random fonts. My guess is same person stamped both .  http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=20518.0

7
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 26, 2024, 12:06:59 PM »
Radiator and rear diff. stamp

8
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 26, 2024, 11:40:37 AM »
Well, I hate to say it but you fellows are correct. The more I look the more signs I see of a repaint. Small amount of orange over spray on the door rubber. Orange on the fog lamp cord. Then when I look at the white stripes I noticed a faith line off to the side under the orange. I think it's the old stripe line. I noticed the trunk bumpers are painted orange also. I apologize for my 90% factory paint statement. The good news is this will end my decision on whether to repaint the car or not....its not original now so it don't matter. The documentation is what drew me back to the car anyways. It wasn't the paint job for sure.   

9
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 25, 2024, 01:10:57 PM »
Fair enough. I questioned it being original myself but was told it was from the seller. Her daddy bought it new. I question the road rash on the car. I walked up front(fog light area) and I see enough rock chips to equal 94 K miles. I looked behind the tires and there was some but not a lot. I noticed the trim around the fenders had been changed.  Then I look through the receipts and see where daddy had mud flaps put on the car at the dealership. Yes, I said it mud flaps! Other than on the doors and rear quarters I honestly can't tell where it has been touched up. I couldn't see the touched-up areas in pictures prior to me seeing the car and still can't in those pictures. I took pictures myself yesterday and I can't see it in those either. The owner claimed she didn't know it had been touched up, but I can clearly see it. I showed her right before I passed on the car the first time. I don't see any touch ups in the cowl area on the orange. If it was then whoever done it should have redone the doors. Now the black might have been repainted when the engine was pulled. Sorry If I mislead you with my 90% factory paint. I'm still not convinced it's not factory paint though. I know its lacquer paint for sure. If it was repainted, then it was done prior to 1984 for sure. In fact, it had to be touched up prior to 1984 so it was painted prior to that if it was.  Just don't make sense to me. Too many small dings here and there from years of use. Then again some of those dings could have happened during storage. Car was parked in storage in 1984.

Here is the original tag. She cleaned up pretty good.

10
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 23, 2024, 08:29:28 PM »
Bell housing pictures. Hard to get without a lift. The car still has the reverse lockout on it. I don't see any balancing marks on the driveshaft, but it was most likely painted.

11
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 23, 2024, 08:20:44 PM »
Firewall and cowl tag

12
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 23, 2024, 10:53:33 AM »
Picture of the firewall and inside the trunk

13
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 23, 2024, 10:51:14 AM »
I think the bell housing was repainted completely orange when the engine was pulled.

14
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 23, 2024, 01:55:01 AM »
Tag bracket with a GM number. I also noticed a K A 24 stamped on the body panel behind the tag bracket. I see a 24 stamped in one corner under the trunk lid on the body.

15
Original Cars and Details / Re: 1969 Z28 time capsule
« on: January 23, 2024, 01:48:48 AM »
window sticker

Pages: [1] 2