Messages

61

Originality / Original "Endura" bumper brackets & mounting hardware

« on: February 20, 2008, 01:16:00 AM »

Hi all!

I'm working on a '69 Camaro project and I need the original mounting brackets & hardware for the "Endura" bumper.  I know repro's are available, but I only want original
components.  Here is an image I found of an orignal outer bracket ( assembled ) to the bumper.  I'd like to see these components separated so I can see exactly what
real ones look like.  The socket head cap screw used to attach the bracket to the bumper is also critical.



Can anyone post one or more images of the original outer bracket(s), bushings, bolts?  Also, I'd like to see what the original bolts looked like that attached
the inner brackets to the bumper as well.

Finding this stuff (correct) is like hens teeth.

Steve

62

Restoration / Re: Good Photos of 1969 SS350 Engine?

« on: November 12, 2007, 02:39:08 PM »

Yeah I hope you find some. I would love some pictures of a 69 ss with 396/325

Earl,

There are tons of big block images for reference all over the internet.  The main differences between your L/35 ( non-SHP ) and the SHP ( L/78 )
396's are:  dual vs. single fule lines, Rochester vs. Holley carb, cast iron vs. aluminum intake, and 4-blade vs. 7-blade fan.  All else is the same as it
pertains to engine painting, component finishes, exhaust manifolds, bracketry finishes, etc..  One possible exception would be A/C, which was not
available on the SHP engines.

Sadly, many non-SHP 396 engines morphed into SHP engines during the late 1990's due to potential resale values - hence the reason for the lack of
non-SHP 396 variants.

Steve

63

Restoration / Re: Carburetor restoration problem

« on: November 12, 2007, 02:16:16 AM »

Hi Earl,

I'm glad that's somewhat cleared up.  I'm sure Phil is too. 

He really is a great guy and has always done a super job on my carbs, as well as the carbs of many others here. 
It's unfortunate there was a mis-communication of sorts.  I trust Phil will deliver you a carb to your liking.  Hopefully,
he can find you the proper dated carb as well

BTW, keep me posted on the dyno results.

Steve

64

Restoration / Re: Carburetor restoration problem

« on: November 11, 2007, 02:21:43 AM »

I sent my Quadrajet to http://www.customrebuiltcarbs.com/index.shtml , when l sent it out he told me 2 weeks. That was now over 2 months ago. Now I know things like this take time and l don't mind waiting alittle more than what l was told but when l call him to see whats going on, and l have only called 3 times so far, l get the run around like he's on the phone etc. l have been told he'll call me back blah blah blah. l know they are busy but this is bull. Has anyone had any experience with these guys?  Earl

I have used Custom Rebuilt Carbs many times in the past with no issues at all.  On a personal note, Phil is a close friend of mine and I find it
difficult to believe that he would give you the run around.  He's as straight as they come.  If you are still having problems, contact me ASAP
and I will intercede on your behalf.  Steve

65

Originality / Re: Correct Carb 69 396 325hp

« on: November 11, 2007, 02:16:52 AM »

L/34 is the 350hp-396.  L/35 is the 325hp-396

7029204 and 7029215 are the 396-350hp & 427-390hp carbs based on my research.

Steve

66

General Discussion / Re: DX-1 Stripe

« on: November 04, 2007, 03:02:55 PM »

Tom,

I believe that multi-colored nose stripe was called the bumble-bee stripe.  I've never seen one in the 27 years since I got the bug to restore my '69 SS.

Steve

67

Originality / Re: Original 69 big block crank pulley bolts

« on: October 22, 2007, 04:37:10 AM »

Hi John,

Are you sure about that thread count?  Every set I've seen ( ebay ) seem to be coarse threads.

Steve

68

Originality / Re: 69Z Cold Air Hood Option

« on: October 19, 2007, 10:25:28 PM »

Steve,

Other than the ZL-2 wire hole, there are other indicators for you to look for as well.

1) Throttle rod upper pivot arm with a welded tab to mount the activation switch.

2) Screw holes in the passenger side firewall where the relay was mounted.

Nuch

69

Originality / Original 69 big block crank pulley bolts

« on: October 19, 2007, 10:19:58 PM »

Hi all!

I'm in the final phases of assembly on my '69 396 and I misplaced a number of the original bolts & fasteners.  In particular this time, I am looking for the
three ( 3 ) original bolts that mounted the lower pulley to the vibration dampner.  Can anyone describe these bolts to me, or better yet post an image?

Were they standard 3/8-16UNC hex head bolts with a split style lock washer?  Or, were they hex head bolts with an integral washer?  What is the length
of the correct bolt?

Lastly, anyone got a set of three originals that are looking for a new home?

Nuch

70

General Discussion / Re: Found a 69 COPO CLONE 427/425hp

« on: September 18, 2007, 02:48:20 AM »

$124,500.00 for a clone!!!  Have things gotten that crazy?  I'd expect to see tons more images for a price like that.

Steve

71

General Discussion / Re: Missing Trim Tag

« on: September 18, 2007, 02:41:52 AM »

Well, as you can see, this is sort of a hands off subject.  Too much information to supply to the bad guys out there.  Present company excluded.

If you want a "correct" trim tag, look at the cars on ebay and study their trim tags for a while.  Also, take as many digital images of Camaros at car
shows as you can.  You will eventually back door into what the repro tag needs. 

I know you guys were looking for a definitive answer here, but your own research is going to win the day for you.  JMHO

Nuch

72

Restoration / Re: Correct '69 L-78 front springs?

« on: September 17, 2007, 02:02:04 PM »

OK Mark - THANKS!

Based on the elusive 3rd page, with 249 pounds ( factor ) - here's my situation ( see image ):





So the standard "YP" and "BF" coded springs ( highlighted in red ) are what I'm after.  But what about
the heavy duty options ( highlighted in green )?  I've been through the archives ( regarding suspension ). 
Can anyone better explain the F41 & G31 options?  I understand that the F41 & G31 options offered
better handling.  Did one mandate the other?  In other words, could you order F41 without G31, or visa-versa? 
What components were included as part of these options?

Why would these options be ordered?  Or, were they mandated via certain codes ( COPO, ZL-1, etc. )?

Lastly, how do you know if your Camaro had standard or heavy duty suspension ( without the build sheet )?

I think I'm starting to understand why some big block Camaros have incorrect ride heights........

73

Restoration / Re: Correct '69 L-78 front springs?

« on: September 16, 2007, 04:04:59 PM »

Here's a link to an on-line spring calculator for the '69 Camaro:  http://www.chevynova.org/69_12437_L34_L35_L78_Springs.htm

74

Restoration / Re: Correct '69 L-78 front springs?

« on: September 16, 2007, 03:57:27 PM »

Houston - we have a problem........

75

Restoration / Re: Correct '69 L-78 front springs?

« on: September 15, 2007, 11:20:52 PM »

Hi John!

Yes, I did just arrive at a weight factor using the charts.  I arrived at 249 pounds and that puts me into the "YO" coded front springs.
The problem, and the crux of my concerns, is that I see so many BBC Camaro's that sit too high on the front wheels after restoration.
I assume their owners, or restorers, tried to get the proper springs too.  What explains this problem and more importantly, how can I
avoid the same problem and get the correct springs the first time?

Steve