Messages

526

General Discussion / Re: roller rockers

« on: May 07, 2021, 04:16:02 AM »

I don't know what the hp gain would be, if any, but there would be less friction and wear with roller rockers.

527

Promotional Events and Concept Cars / Re: WIN A NEW 1969 CAMARO! Documenting Sweepstakes Contests & Raffles from 1968/1969

« on: May 06, 2021, 02:03:13 AM »

I really like the Mod Art vibe in those ads.

I remember reading the MCR article. Interesting that you could also order anything additional that you wanted.

528

General Discussion / Re: Water pump date codes

« on: May 06, 2021, 01:49:37 AM »

I think an early Jan date would work also; anything before the 7th.

529

General Discussion / Re: JohnZ --

« on: April 30, 2021, 04:05:01 AM »

John is such an incredible part of the hobby. And his immense knowledge, that he has willingly shared, is a testament to his character.

530

General Discussion / Re: Carburation Ideas

« on: April 17, 2021, 01:13:51 AM »

By crossboss: Why not consider a 650 DP? Might be a better choice for some drivability on the street than the 'larger' carb(s).

Now THAT I can agree with! Most people install carbs that are way too much for what they're doing. Heck, even HOLLEY recommends a 650 for the 427 I'm installing in my 57 Chevy!

I sent Jerry a Holley 4777 650 double pumper I plan on trying out and I should be getting it back within the next few weeks. I also sent him two 3310's (both 3878261-EH carbs) that I'll try out and see which I like better, the 650 or the 780. I have a feeling the 4777 650 double pumper will be more in line with the street especially since I don't plan on pushing the RPM's past 5k.

Take a look at the Holley site and be honest with the numbers. If you have a 302 that's stock, but never plan on revving it past 6k, even a 4776 600 double pumper would be good enough! Or, a 4777 650 double pumper if you want a little more.

Ed

Great info in both of the responses above. But what about for the person that wants to keep their car stock? My carb was restored by Jerry and went on the dyno with my 302 after he rebuilt that. So, I have no doubt it's perfectly set up.

Otherwise, I think you have to start by checking the float adjustment and move to checking spark plug color. Once you figure that out and know which jets work best for your driving style, you can play with power valves.

531

Decoding/Numbers / Re: Caveat Emptor...another repro body tag?

« on: April 16, 2021, 02:14:24 AM »

Self explanatory.

532

Decoding/Numbers / Re: Alternator/Water Pump dates

« on: April 16, 2021, 02:04:25 AM »

All,

I have a '69 Z11 with engine build date of T0409.
Would an early April, say April 2 alternator be ok for this engine? Too late?
Same with an early April water pump?

So I found a D89 (April 8, 1969), 1 day before the engine build date.  Is that acceptable?  Could they cast, machine, assemble and paint a water pump on the 8th and install it on my engine on the 9th? Did that happen?

I think it would be reasonable if the foundry was close to the engine plant, which I assume it was. The assembly would be simple and not take long to build. The water pump would be shipped to the engine plant and installed and painted with the engine assembly.

533

General Discussion / Re: Carburation Ideas

« on: April 16, 2021, 01:48:16 AM »

I agree with Ed's numbers 1,3 and 5. Let him know the issues you're having and I'm sure you won't be disappointed. As for the Pertronix, I think it's a good choice. I've used it on several cars as well as friends using them without any issues. Then again, some may find problems, but over 50%?

534

General Discussion / Re: Jl8 brake option

« on: April 16, 2021, 01:34:10 AM »

Do you still own that car, Kurt??   If not, when did you own it? Maybe it's the same car???   This one is Daytona Yellow, black vinyl top, AC Auto, 396/350 hp...

That’s got to be one great car optioned like that Gary....

I agree, Chick, and I'd love to have the car...  in spite of my not being a 'big block fan' and not knowing the origin of the JL8 components...   

Looking back now, I can't believe that back when I read the local ad (early 1977) for a '69 Camaro' for $900 from the local Olds dealer, that I didn't go check it out..  but I *assumed* it was probably 'just another ragged out' Camaro based on the price the dealer was asking! ...  and that was during a period that I 'checked out' almost all the locally advertised early Camaros !

Sounds like during the oil embargo days. Everyone was dumping muscle cars.

535

General Discussion / Re: Survival Rate

« on: April 16, 2021, 01:30:40 AM »

Anyone remember 'Marv's Chevy Only'? They were just down the street from the Pick a Part in Sun Valley.

Yep

536

Site Comments/Discussion / Re: VIN Registry / database

« on: April 14, 2021, 08:26:09 PM »

I have been asked what's in the db.
At this point, it's over 22,000 cars. Some of those cars do not exist, only paperwork or drivetrain survives.
There are clear distortions in the data. While we have 4060 convertibles in the db (6.5% of convertibles made), the 17,170 coupes is only 2.5% of production.
Z28 - 2300  8% of total production
L6 - 2950  2% of total production
That tells something of the survival rates of convertibles and Z28's.

Curious if these statistics are just 1969 model year, or all first gen combined? I removed the obvious models from the original post.

537

Promotional Events and Concept Cars / Re: WIN A NEW 1968 CAMARO! Documenting Sweepstakes Contests & Raffles from 1967/1968

« on: April 14, 2021, 07:50:54 PM »

[quote
Notice the reason the owner placed a classified ad for his 1962 Cadillac in the newspaper: "Reason owner won Camaro, Dino Dollar"
[/quote]

And selling the Caddy for $995! What a score!

Really fun to look at this stuff Scott! Thanks for your time and effort in putting it together!

538

General Discussion / Re: Survival Rate

« on: April 14, 2021, 07:17:34 PM »

Fakes and rebodies further compromise the results.

539

Foreign Camaros / Re: Swiss Camaro "Technische Spezifikation"

« on: April 10, 2021, 09:53:01 PM »

Pretty cool! Is that one page, or is it a pamphlet with other specs?

540

Garage Talk / Re: More fun!

« on: April 08, 2021, 10:35:52 PM »

Well I do have an opinion on this one. Still a large portion of the Pro Mod and Top Sportsman cars are 63 split windows. Its something that in 2021 you can go 220 mph in a 1963 body style. They got it right. Granted they are aftermarket stretched, widened bodies and chassis but still 80% correct to the original body. With that being said I did destroy a nice 63 roadster at the Atlanta NHRA divisional. Not much left of that car. Pic attached for your viewing pleasure......

That totally sucks. Such a nice race car. I cringed when I saw your post/pictures. Im sure we all can agree, Cobra's and 'Vette's are some of the most beautiful and beloved cars ever made!

Absolutely!